Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Thank You Roy Rosenzweig


When diving into Omeka it is a good idea to take heed of Ariadne’s advice to Theseus and leave a trail so you know how to get back.  Once in though, this labyrinth is well worthwhile.  Instead of the Minotaur, the persistent explorer discovers the carefully crafted architecture of “the web site,” the very vehicle of dissemination of knowledge and information on the Internet.  The magic is hidden, crafted into an intuitive set of templates so that anyone with a little patience can pull the levers and be the Wizard of Oz (to mix metaphors).
. 
Which is sort of why Omeka exists.  In a world of competition, advertising and proprietary systems, and in reaction to the frenzy of digitization that has come to dominate our institutions of memory, someone had to provide some life rafts and it is not surprising that it would be the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media.  Though pioneer Rosenzweig did not live to see this latest realization of his goal, which was to “democratize the past – both by incorporating forgotten voices and by presenting the fullest possible story of the past to diverse audiences,” I’m sure he would have been very proud of its design and the scope of its success.[1]

Omeka was designed to fit a particular niche in the galaxy of the Internet, one that was not really being served.  The creators describe Omeka as being:

a next-generation publishing platform for museums, historical societies, scholars, enthusiasts, and educators. Omeka provides cultural institutions and individuals with easy-to-use software for publishing collections and creating attractive, standards-based, interoperable online exhibits. Free and open-source, Omeka is designed to satisfy the needs of institutions that lack technical staffs and large budgets.[2]

In his blog ‘Found History,’ Tom Scheinfeldt, Director-at-Large of the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media, describes the disconnect between the tools of the collections professionals of our libraries, museums and archives and those of the “humanist or interpretive professionals.”  Both serve different purposes.   The former strive to preserve collections, maintain standards of metadata and provide discovery services.  The latter aim to enlighten by generating knowledge and creating meaning.  Omeka was developed to meet the needs of both groups in one easy to use package and thereby it encourages collaboration between collection professionals and interpretive professionals and between the “back of house” and “front of house” staff of our institutions of memory.  It enables us to leverage our meticulously maintained archives and bring them out into the open for public inspection on a grand scale.  By bringing together rigorous standards in managing and presenting collections through the use of Dublin Core, and the flexibility of web authoring tools and interpretive opportunities, Omeka offers something that is, at least for now, unique.[3]

There is no doubt about its success.  By its own accounts it now has over 5,500 users working on approximately 3,800 sites and the growth rate is about 120 sites a month.  In October, Omeka 2.0 will be launched, and the authors paint such a delectable vision of possibilities that I wish that our own delving into the labyrinth was coming in just a few more weeks.

I would like to dedicate this blog to the man who was the heartbeat behind the concept.  In his own scholarship Roy Rosenzweig’s goal was to present what he called the “perspectives of ordinary men and women.”[4]  Surely enabling the creation of thousands of web sites across the digital universe, putting many more thousands of items of human culture in the public domain for common view, and giving voice to thousands of interpretations is a bold move towards that goal.

Thank you Roy Rosenzweig.




 http://hnn.us/articles/43739.html



[1] http://hnn.us/articles/43739.html. Rosenzweig died in 2007 and Omeka was launched in February 2008
[2] http://chnm.gmu.edu/omeka/
[4] http://hnn.us/articles/43739.html

No comments:

Post a Comment