But Can You Make Your Way Back?
One of the hazards of the web has to be the retracing of
steps to locate again that significant information that has just now eluded
you. In the short term the chore is
relatively easy. Over the long term,
however, broken URL’s, unsupported sites and web migrations leave the user with
a feeling akin to Pooh and Piglet as they follow their own footsteps round and
round a spinney in the 100 acre wood.
Confusion and loss.
The dichotomy of scarcity or abundance in the digital
archive of the future has been hotly debated.
Though perhaps most recent scholarship sees the cup full, many of the
web’s customers have been confounded by the “here today gone tomorrow” vagary
of the medium.[1] Fragility, dependence on ever evolving applications
that become obsolete apparently over night, or mere human error, can wipe out
whole swathes of data in a heartbeat. Many
have experienced that moment of “here now and oops gone” on their own PC’s and countless
hard drives have succumbed to dereliction or lightening strikes. Virtual after all is, “virtual”. Therefore, despite predictions of an over
abundance of digital records as they proliferate across the world’s computer
networks, preserving the content of our digital universe in any kind of order
is an ongoing task of apparently monumental proportions.
What a delight then it is to find the “Way Back Machine” whose
purpose is to retrieve sample web sites in their various enhancements over
their life spans from a growing Internet Archive.[2] Indeed the Internet Archive site itself embodies
some of the most unique and brilliant features of the digital universe. Since
1996 an unimaginable 150 billion web pages have been archived and organized for
retrieval using the Way Back Machine digital tool. The searcher can effortlessly pull up the pages in a
variety of ways to closely observe change over time. (I notice that the web site is currently in Beta and I wonder what the new version will bring?)
Subjecting a web site to the “Way Back Machine” is in itself
an adventure in digital history as it illustrates not only the history of the
evolving organization that is responsible for its contents, but also the
history of the Internet itself with its growing levels of sophistication.
I decided to load up into the machine a history web site called
“The Proceedings of the Old Bailey” . The first of the 324 home pages that
have been captured by “Way Back” is dated Feb 13th 2003 and is a pre-launch
start with a simple design in mainly black on an aged linen paper background. Although it makes use of some illustration the
page is text heavy and similar to a page in a book or magazine, using mostly
horizontal space. Though it is just an
announcement of things to come it does establish style elements of the web site
for the next four years. Colors are
limited but pleasant on the eye, business is up front and clarity underpins the
layout. Navigation aids are clearly
listed in a long left side bar and some major elements such as search tools are
repeated in the main body of the page. A
comparison between the first and last version of this home page before it
morphed in 2008 reveals little change except the addition of new information
such as “Copyright Information and Citation Guide” in the navigation bar, new
links to information about the project as it becomes more far reaching and of
course the addition of increasing numbers of documents that can be
searched. Historical background
information migrates almost unchanged in fact and this continues up to the
present 7th version of the web site.
No need to re-make the wheel after all!
The site’s 5th version can be viewed for May 9th,
2008 and reveals a very polished and professional overhaul that endures to this day. This suggests both the growing variety of
options available to web designers and a likely infusion of resources to make
it happen. The baby is not thrown out,
however. Underpinnings of content and
familiar devices such as the highlighted, “On This Day In…..” are maintained in
the new look. Even Hogarth’s familiar
old wigged barristers are kept in to oversee proceedings, though now it is
possible to notice their delinquency and get the humor of the scene (take a
look at them at the bottom of home page).
The new home entry page creates a fuller story of the site with its
colorful banner underlining the adage that a picture paints a thousand
words. The old linen background has been
replaced by basic white, allowing text to be smaller and tighter and creating
more definition for the various highlighted boxes of information on the
page. The page now makes more use of
vertical space, being divided into three columns and keeping the information in
the center for ease of reading and the “business” to the sides. Navigation aids are listed both along the side as previously and across the top, which seems to have become the new convention for web sites. Since searching is probably the most
important part of the web site for the user this now has its own clearly
demarked box which simply distills a search to two options, though other
options are available. Complexities
still exist, but are relegated to deeper pages that can be quickly retrieved.
Let’s see……what dreadful thing happened on this day (Sept 11th) in
1734?
I guess it would be a lot to ask for the URL to be more self explanatory?
[1] John
Unsworth, dean of University of Illinois’’ Library School, quoted in Digital
Age Presents New Problems for Historians http://www.livescience.com/10746-digital-age-presents-problems-historians.html;
Roy Rosenzweig, Scarcity or Abundance, Preserving the Past in a Digital Era
[2] It is
interesting to see that it has a counterpart created at the New Library of
Alexandria in Egypt. Collaboration is
what it’s all about! http://archive.bibalex.org,
I really enjoy your style of writing Tina. It is crisp and concise and easy to read. I also will have to get you to show me how you are doing those footnotes!
ReplyDeleteThank you, that is a great compliment. I really enjoyed the lively debate you engendered last night. I have not had time to look at many blogs.....but that is on my list for the weekend, and I'm looking forward to reading yours.
ReplyDeleteAs for the footnotes, I just compose in word and the Blogger fairies do the rest. I see though that they link the footnote numbers to a random page in Blogger instead of to the footnotes!
I started out with Word because I was really worried that I'd end up Blogging some odd draft...but I see now that it may give you more choice over font size, color etc....unless I'm missing some nuance in Blogger, which could well be the case.
Did you find that it took forever to figure out the puzzle letters to prove you are not a robot when you made comments on someone elses blog?